, , ,




Science for the Benefit of People

Education is a granting already known knowledge, but the science is an opening the new ones. Being engaged in a science, we open natural laws, we collect and we systematize knowledge of laws of development of a nature, a society, each separate person, his thinking and ways of influence on world around. Thus, working on progress, the science should help us to create our achievements instead of to destroy them. Having no knowledge, practical skills or life experience, it is possible to get in different unusual situations which results in the extremely unpleasant consequences. And then they say: It will be your experience. First, it occurs to those who does not know itself; second, if act at random, doing something, not knowing what to do and how to do it. In order to prevent this, it do not neglect the knowledge. Especially socionics, as a science which has opened laws of mentality of the person.

The mentality of the person was not studied so fruitfully as at the end of XX century - the sight of a science was inverted basically to a material world. Only isolated esoterical currents, philosophical and religious directions tried to learn essence of the person. There are many sights and theories, but it is only socionics which proves now practical effectiveness of the theoretical knowledge. It develops as well as other sciences. For example, the Scientific Enlightenment Institute Socionics Technologies has in its arsenal some fundamental scientific inventions and technological investigations which practically confirm their effectiveness. There are: the theory of a belonging of the certain type of temperament to the certain socionic type, emotions and an emotional condition according to type of temperament, peculiarities of thinking, language, imagination, memory, development and becoming of the personality due to socionic type, the law of dependence of socionic type of a child on socioninic types of his parents, the law of an orientation of realization of mental qualities, the law of a mental balance, the law of the socion organization in a society. Observation and the analysis of actions of natural relationships on mentality of the person have resulted in revealing the reasons why people get in these or those relationships and what mental distortions occur in them under action of relationships. On the basis of it there is maid the categorical conclusion: the family should be only the dual one.

The main thing in socionics is the definition of socionic personality type. Only in case of 100-percentage correctness of definition of personality types use of laws of socionics will bring practical benefit. Unfortunately, there are enough theoretical investigations in socionics, but there is no the uniform technology of definition of personality types. Each expert uses own methods, as a rule, on the basis of dialogue, but any of them do not give a guarantee of 100-percentage correctness. There was made even the offer to consider that the definition is correct if there are 70 % - 80 % of hit. But it is inadmissible.

The complex technology of definition of personality type in Scientific Enlightenment Institute Socionics Technologies includes:
1. Audiovisual diagnostics which allows to determine personality type by the phone, on appearance and movements.
2. The analysis of the use of lexicon at easy short conversation.
3. Physiognomy. For accuracy of definition the scrupulous analysis of photos at studying all details of features and expressions of eyes is made.
4. Feedback. The description of characteristic qualities of the person for confirmation of correctness of definition of personality type.

There were no cases of erroneous definition of personality types for 10 years of practical activities. We offer experts-socionics to improve the skills of definition of personality type, taking a short course on definition of personality types or to join to work of our Institute and to improve own skills during cooperation, to get the real professionalism. The society demands socionic services. But middle-aged people are so cracked by present problems and disappointed with opportunities to learn the person and to help him because of charlatanism of extrasenses, guessings, an astrology and esoterics, that do not trust opportunities of socionics. They, unfortunately, have inertness of thinking, are dependent on existing norms and public stereotypes. Therefore socionics can enter a society if to work on prospect - to help children and youth.

We offer to unite efforts of physicians and genetics to find other ways of more simple definition of personality types when it is possible to allocate mental typical features through physiological parameters. Then definition of personality types becomes more accessible, but now our technology demands experience.

As socionics opens completely essence of the person, its laws should be taken into account in researches of other sciences about the person. We invite those scientists who are not indifferent to true knowledge and experience for development of sciences about the person, to discussions, a constructive exchange of ideas to approach in cooperation theoretical searches to real practical application for granting the effective help to people.

 Problems of sciences about the person

Not belittling achievements of all sciences which study persons, it is necessary to note, that at the big volume of observations and the saved up theoretical knowledge, philosophy, displaying ways of search of true, it is torn off the validity, and the psychology and sociology are considered by experts a theoretical dump. These sciences are a huge conglomerate of theories and techniques which explain much, but do not work. They do not own universal knowledge, have no that tool which would unit in a single whole knowledge of the person and a society. In conditions of pluralism a frustrated condition has arisen among theorists of sciences about the person. Scientists try to synthesize theories, to unit them, to deduce precise system, laws which could explain all phenomena of public life. But it is impossible to do it: each theory describes a particle in public processes, and becomes effectless for an explanation of other public phenomenon, and does not work in practice. Why? Because it is necessary to begin not from the end, but from the beginning, from sources - not from the public phenomena, as superstructures and consequences but from a basis of bases - activity of mentality of each person - the participant of public processes. You see the mentality is incorporated by a nature and operates according to natural laws. Socionics has opened these laws. It explains, how the mentality of the person is arranged and describes its structure, opens laws of interpersonal interactions. It is explained according to the law of structure of mentality of the person, the law of mental compatibility, the law of socion and the socion organization in a society, according to natural interactions with a society.

Why do sciences about the person are in state of stagnation, confusion as if are tired out in a boondocks of feebleness? It occures because a basis of development of these sciences were positivism - a recognition of reliability of any knowledge and empiricism - occurrence of theories on the basis of observation, experiences and collected facts. And as the person and a society is the many-sided, ambiguous and complex phenomenon, an actual material and a conclusion on its basis might be incomplete, but there were maid generalizations which did not explain others, even the similar phenomena. Such observations, conclusions and theories has collected too much, and it has resulted only in chaos and confusion among researchers and scientists. The theories which have been not checked up in practice, continue to exist, bringing dissociation, turmoil, mess because in confusion of huge amount of ideas, theories and systems the true is lost.

It is hard to overestimate what can make socionics for these sciences. As socionics has opened essence of the person that proves to be true by practical results, it may become that nucleus, or litmus which will check up and order all other ideas and will bring precise system to all sciences about the person. Erroneous ideas and theories will be cast away, as impractical, and others will get a practicality. Socionics can give the practical tool for research of a social reality. It comes from objective interest : shows a root - essence of the person, and all another - how the person operates in a society, depends on sources - his mentality, you see activity of mentality motivates behaviour. The mentality is a basis, a society is a superstructure - the result of action and interaction of mentalities of people. Therefore investigating a society, it is necessary to know the bases, further causes and effects of everything that occurs in a society are opened through knowledge of socionic laws. It is necessary only to put sciences about the person and a society from a head on legs in order to eliminate unnecessary, to turn outlook of scientists, to give a push for development in a correct direction of all sciences.

From time to time there is a need for revolutionary changes for creation of new quality. Involution is necessary, as well as evolution. Destruction of forms which became already dead shell and liberation of force which they keep is valuable, as well as creation of new forms. (D.Radjar).

The philosophy searches for universal laws of interrelation of the person and the World, the psychology investigates persons as a universal phenomenon of a nature, the pedagogics searches ways of becoming and development of the personality, the sociology investigates a society. And in addition sociology tries to explain how the person is arranged and cooperates with a society. These are attempts to unite different ideas at different methodological approaches. All over the world sciences revolve because of crisis of classical methodology: it is impossible to put in order huge data files. And the authority of sciences about the person falls.

In a basis of socionics is the theory of an information metabolism - perception, processing and an exchange of the information. It can be taken as a basis of methodology of other sciences, as integrated methodology in any science. So, in sociology it is a lot of theories of an exchange, but practically only the socionic one proves to be true. Why do sociologists do not take it on arms? Laws of socionics will give a new cognitive and tool pulse. All sciences about the person demand knowledge of socionics. The world shouts about approach to the person. In all spheres of life everybody aspire to humanization. Therefore it is necessary to unite efforts of experts for entering sensible breath as common sense in essence of sciences about the person.

Socionics, not rejecting achievements of other sciences about the person, can help them to develop.

 Socionics for philosophy

In philosophy the two basic concepts are differentiated, as two contrasts: the world material and spiritual. The polemic in a question, what is primarily: material or spiritual, proceeds during centuries, you see these concepts are opposed each other. Only in one formulation of the law of struggle and unite of contrasts the contradiction lays. Contrasts act not in struggle, but in interaction. Everything is interdependent in a nature: all phenomena, evrything real in the world are connected among themselves, and all processes mutual influent on each other.

The person is a binding essence between spiritual and material, sense of his life, his mission on the Earth is to be improved itself and to improve life and an environment. Those people who aspire to this and can realize themselves, receive the new information with the purpose of its transformation and transfer by another for progress of mankind. Duality strengthens these opportunities of people. And socion is in general inexhaustible power-information potential in a society.

When scientists will manage to glance on that side of material aspect of a reality, they will seize a true science. For now scientists are still from the outside the present science, they are near it. Step by step opening in a science approach mankind to true, which essence in synthesis of knowledge concerning material and a spiritual world.

The philosophy is a theoretical nucleus of any outlook. The outlook in philosophy is treated as the certain system, integrity of knowledge, principles, sights, ideals, values, habits, the attitude to the world. The outlook is that which makes a person independent, complete, helps to become the personality. But it is noticed, that people have different outlooks, and not in vain there is a pluralism of opinions, sights and directions in philosophy. Socionics has precisely determined, that there are only 16 constant outlooks, inherent in any of 16 socionic personality types which include the certain constant valuable orientations, principles, the ideals, the certain system of outlook and the attitude to the world. The knowledge of the socionic personality type and development of the strong mental qualities conducts to becoming and the statement of the personality.

In philosophy person is considered as integrity in which there is everything for life. It is considered, that it is impossible to estimate advantages without lacks with which the psychology aspires to struggle. Struggle against lacks is artificial and has no results, you see nothing stops and does not break in a nature. It is impossible to have integrity to be itself without lacks. Socionics opens for each concrete person his lacks as weak mental qualities, gives knowledge, which are these qualities and how to not use them to enable to open and use own strong qualities of mentality more full.

Examining correlation of person and the world, the philosophy considers a person, as the uniform essence allocated consciousness due to which he spiritualizes the world. The consciousness is given the person as necessity of his existence and a survival in the world. The consciousness is that reality which bears to the person freedom, and this mechanism is incorporated in the person from birth.

The consciousness is a process of thinking, and in the greater measure it is a process of comprehension of own life and its values. It is a process of a meeting with sense of the life. And sense of the life of the person is to become and be itself, it means to find itself such what you are in depth of the soul and to learn courage and resistance to remain itself in all life situations. It is extremely, incredibly difficultly, - the philosophy considers, - but it is possible. Every concrete step is a realization of the general sense of life. If you realize the general, i.e. find youself, you realizes also all concrete affairs.

Socionics will help with searches of own abilities and opportunities, it gives a real opportunity to find and become yourself. In philosophy therefore it is considered incredibly difficult a process of a finding and self-realization of yourself, as there is no such knowledge which has opened socionics. It is known, that everything ingenious is simple. And all complexities in life arise on ignorance. Is it difficult: to determine the socionic personality type, to know the own strong and weak sides, to orient, in which kinds of activity it is possible to realize yourself in the best way and what of them it is better to avoid? The congenital potential is an essence and depth of a soul, and skill to use only strengths is a skill to remain yourself in all life situations.

The philosophy induces a person to reflect about the sense of the life, how the world is arranged and about a place of the person in, to exchange opinions, different outlooks, to discuss, to enter polemic; all this in general is the original form of dialogue which may result simply in increase of a level of erudition, but often to an exhaustion. Socionics gives the real help in life, it is the tool to actions, and at the same time enables substantial, pleasant dialogue due to power rise and mental satisfaction of all needs of soul.

In philosophy the personality considers the person who has learnt itself and the world and is able to live in it. But if the person has come in this world his task is to make it better. What is the sense of his life then? The person who has learnt itself and the world, is passive in the attitude to it. Among alive essences the person is a single one who has ability to think, analyze, create, and his task is to realize this ability. Sense of the life is in creativity. To find the calling, to realize the talent in creative work - for this purpose we come in the world. The personality is that person who creates. It is socionics, which helps to find the calling. The knowledge of its laws will warn of a wrong choice of a trade and the person for family life. The knowledge of socionic personality types of familiars will help to do with their help correct elections in any life situations. Skill to determine personality types will help to find people on the needs independently, those who can satisfy those or other needs which constantly arise during life.

Having no knowledge of laws of information interaction between people, the philosophy searches for a joy in a private world of the person. But recognizes, that each person understands his secret, intrinsic, deep connections with people who are as if make from one paste, are spiritually close, bring in our life not a destructive, but vital relations. If we should search for something, we should search only ourselves and also those people who help us to open ourself, those people who induce us to search, whom it is easy with. Relationships with them are eternal and boundless. But philosophy does not give knowledge, who are such people. People who bring destruction, spiritual death in our life, destroy desires and interests, supervise, limit freedom, oppress us, we should leave. But before to leave such people, it is necessary to pass through all these sufferings. Definition of socionic personality types and observance of laws of information interactions through disclosing of natural relationships will enable people to avoid disorders of destructive relationships, to find the close person, relationship with whom lead to mutual development and harmony, pleasant and substantial dialogue and mutual aid in all questions, in wide understanding of this word. It is only relationship of duality.

Each person selects an own way in life and his surrounding independently.

 Socionics for sociology

The sociology studies social structures, but thus it is necessary to remember, that there are people who form them, who act actively, can change positions of the separate interconnected parts of structure, a level of restriction of behaviour and a degree of freedom of each part, and also character of mutual relation separate compounds as a result of the common actions. So, the social structure is the alive system dependent on a condition of parts which enter into it, and being united, influence its functioning. Therefore studying of structures should be started from studying of a person. Sociologists address with the help to psychology but it is socionics which can help them essentially as it gives complete knowledge of a person.

The sociological point of view concerning natural essence of the person tears him off from nature and puts him in full dependence on a society in which he is. Therefor biological needs and biological (age, sexual and other) features of the person, his natural inclinations and abilities, physical development, a state of health, a heredity are not taken into account. At the same time there are exaggerated or even absolutised those human gualities which are determined by a social origin of the person, his belonging to any group, a party or a class, his trade, belief, education. In this connection the person is quite often considered as if any abstract or veiled essence which is determined by these or those social groups, by classes and communities, dissolving in them, or reduced only to his social functions - versions of activity.

If to understanding the person in such way it is possible to make wrong conclusions. For example, the thought that each separate person has a less value in compare with a society or with any human community, to which he belong. Or, that any person can be made which it is necessary, changing only public conditions of his life. Or, eventually, that it is possible to teach and bring up different people by the same methods, without consideration individual human differences.

Sociological theories have the beginning from the American society and have arisen from social philosophy and psychologists, were based on observations and generalizations which gave knowledge of laws of behaviour of people. Unfortunately, socionics has appeared much later and only at the present stage offers sociology to use the properties for the decision of one of the central problems - a problem of studying of the person, his interactions in a society.

Why does just this problem is one of central? Because each sociologist for understanding of essence of the social phenomena, systems of interrelations of people in a society should understand, that the mental laws opened by socionics are driving force in acts of each concrete person. The individual behaviour represents the basic understanding of life of all social group or a society.

In sociology it is considered, that the person is one of phenomena, which is hardly to determine unequivocally at once. There are two opposite sights on his development. From the point of view of one, each person is formed and develops according to his inborn qualities and abilities, and the social environment plays thus an insignificant role. Others completely deny inborn internal features and abilities, considering, that the person is a product which is completely formed by means of social experience. It is clear that it is necessary to take into account both biological features and social experience. But the sociology considers, that social factors of formation of the person are more powerful.

In sociology it is considered, that a system forms people, but not people form the system. But actually the basic element of a system-society is the person, as unique individuality and the personality. And the harmonious society is a result of internal harmony of each person.

The erroneous idea in sociology has arisen because it observes and studies an oversystem, as the society without knowledge of system - the person. That is why it tries to analyze consequences, but does not see the reasons, directing a sight in the opposite direction: not from the person to a society, i.e. from system to oversystem, but on the contrary, considering, that oversystem completely regulates behaviour of system, that the society creates the person. But the society only has influence on person who is formed and becomes the personality, proceeding from the natural qualities under influence of public norms.

The initial element of social structure is a social group a set of people, who take an identical social position or carry out one social role. According to quantity social groups share on small (SSG) and big (SG).

Big social groups consist of classes, ethnoses and nations.

It is necessary to stop on the analysis of small social groups and how they are investigated in sociology and socionics. In sociology the small social group considers a group where a contact between its members is possible, its number changes in borders 35 - 100 people. Socionics proves, that appropriate contact in such chaotically collected group will not be, it will break up anyway to a grouping where people due to their socionic personality types will be belong to one kvadra.

The least social group in socionics is a diada. In sociology such group is considered as permanent conflicted, as each conflict in it is central. The most steady least group considers a triad as each person in it will play a role of the arbitrator between two others. And now imagine, that between two people there is a conflict, and the third one listens from them regrets and even still the worse - slander. What psychological and the moral atmosphere will be between them? You see those third estimations who is right and who is guilty, only may inflame passions in a dispute and spread discord, understanding a situation. He is outside of situation as the observer, therefore does not know, that those two were already explained, and even in general there was nothing serious between them, but he having apprehended events differently, creates wrong telephone through slanders, any nonsenses and insignificant things raises gossips. Reasonably there is a proverb: The third is unnecessary or Two is company, three is not or Two is already many.

The sociology tries to show also social relations and structure of the person. But without knowledge of natural laws of mentality of the person and information interactions, which are opened by socionics, conclusions of sociology will be superficial and even erroneous.

For example, it examines a role behaviour of the person and recognizes, that people carry out the majority of social roles unsuccessfully as do not accept their matter or simply do not want to carry out them. The person and a role which he carries out, connected by the certain psychological characteristics which approach for performance of the certain social roles. Socionics opens this dependence. Ignoring its laws, people feel a role pressure and the role conflict.

The example of a role pressure is when the person carries out under pressure of circumstances a role which does not answer neither to his interests, no inclinations, internal installations. If the role conflict becomes aggravated, it may result in refusal to fulfill role duties then the person receives internal stress and departs from the given role.

And if a person were itself it would be no necessity to play roles and adjust himself, he would be then on his own place and performance would be quality, and there would be less problems, and life would be more pleasant. The own role is a qualitative realization of itself according to strengths of the socionic personality type.

The role pressure and the role conflict represent a serious social and psychological problem. Socionics can forewarn of these phenomena. And the society can achieve such level when a person will be itself everywhere, realising his potential in the best way. Then the social pressure will be taken off.

Only that person can achieve the life success who is itself and completely realizes himself due to strong character traits, uses the potential without superfluous efforts and a special strain. Therefore the self-knowledge and knowledge of others is one of formulas of life success. The structure of a person is a classical concept of sociology and social psychology. Socionics investigates mental structure of the person and his interrelations with surrounding, but uses other conceptual device and other research receptions, than sociology and psychology. The person is characterized by set of social-psychological qualities and realize himself in a system of social and interpersonal interactions.

Is it possible to create social-psychological model of the person? Such attempts were repeatedly carried out in psychology and sociology. But as these sciences use the different conceptual device the models offered by them differ.

The basis of social-psychological model of the person which is described by sociology, has such elements:

1. Position of the person in a society, in enterprises, organizations ets.
2. Actions of social factors: conditions, surrounding, friends, relatives, parents.
3. Formation of the person, education, development, socialization.
4. Social activity, way of life, style of life, social role, the status.
5. Needs, valuable orientations, interests, motives, expectation ets.
6. Ideal, belief, hope, love, the responsibility, freedom, happiness ets.
7. Sociological structure of the person, his spiritual world ets.

From the list it is visible, that such conceptual device enables to concentrate attention basically only on external factors which render direct influence on formation of the person and on his life. But the list does not take into account internal factors which determine a constant way of ability to live of the person in different social systems. Therefore the traditional sociological structure of the person does not give such model which would be effective at classification of types. It is possible to describe by sociological concepts only a level of development as it depends on social conditions which the person live in and as far as how full he acquired and uses knowledge as experience of the past generations. But an emotional sphere of the person, his thinking and motives of behaviour are not clear.

Recently sociologists try to correct this lack and to create typology which would take into account emotional sphere of the person, but have not determined a basis for classification, some different classifications therefore have appeared, any of which has not clearness and concrete definiteness. For example: classification with such names of types: Creator, Consumer, Romantic, Lider, , , or Kind man Humanist, Niggard. Proceeding from a plenty of classifications it is possible to come to the conclusion that according to elected basis it is possible to create the not limited amount classifications which would characterize this or that side of the person, but there is not the perfect one which can characterize him comprehensively. The problem is to find such basis which would allow to unite all set of social-psychological properties of the person. It can not be decided separately neither psychology no sociology. Why to not address to socionics, you see complex qualitative knowledge occur on a joint of sciences. So, if the sociology will take for itself practical properties of socionics, it can develop further and have more practical results in its multiplane work.

 Socionics for pedagogics

Connections of psychologies and pedagogics are mostly found out in natural unity of training, education and development of growing generation. Training and education are categories especially pedagogical, development - a category physiological and psychological. The psychology investigates results of development of the person at the certain stage and ascertains them, socionics shows laws of development, that is why it can correct, direct and improve it.

In history of pedagogics the concepts of development and education were opposed one another as incompatible: or free natural development, or education, as violence upon the person, oppression of his nature. But it is necessary to put a question wider: not education, as formation from the outside and violently, but a direction, the help, correct orientation of the individuality given by nature to development of the personality. Not self-education, but self-development, not struggle against lacks, but accent on positive qualities. The stronger merits will florish, the further demerits will depart and retire to the background. Each person, knowing the strong sides, confidently may develop them and be guided by them, using in any life situations.

The status quo of the person is to keep his own essence such which it is. It means, that he has already brought something new in this world from the birth, he need only to find it out and revive in an initial kind. It is not liable to education or standard development. For this purpose it is necessary to have the key which opens secret in a light empire life on the Earth. Such key is socionic type. Everything what person has, demands a favorable, fertile ground - a direction and unchained in his displays for disclosing an own reserve, stocks which are specially kept for use them by person in case of need performance of the intended mission, the certain task. This task becomes obvious and clear only under conditions of knowledge of due to disclosing a mental-genetic code - socionic personality type; communication in a diada when harmony of relations of duality and own strengths are felt; in kvadra - when there is a realization of own qualities; in socion - when there are used achievements of kvadras. And for the beginning it is necessary to have the more broad audience of familiar duals for sensation of pleasant mutual relationship, for creation of dual families and to enable children to grow unchained and free, and to understand better the others through the force of duality, to find the own place among those trades which open new and new reserves to creative work. Such is an intention of the main Law of a nature - to connect a person to the whole - the universe. And newborn has come in our already rendered habitable life to teach us something here. Let us listen skilfully.

But now, not knowing the individuality given by nature, the person make experiments on itself, rushing from one extreme measure to another, not knowing where to apply the abilities in the best way and which inclinations he has.

Socionics gives the knowledge of own natural abilities. Addressing with the help to socionics, the person acquires knowledge of the natural inclinations and has an opportunity to develop them, directing in a true channel. His opportunities are opened before him and he confidently walks a life, avoiding mistakes, working more productive and with pleasure, feeling happiness and sense of the life.

Private world of the child is pure, natural, not breaking by standard morals of a society, the child is free in the displays, frank and sincery, kind and human. Every child is bettter then any adult. The adult began the worse under influence of life stratifications - hypocrisy of public moral, oppression of public laws, insincerity of the public relations. Having adapted to a society, adult ruins an own nature, a spontaneity. The children's boldness changes by adult discretion, uncontrollable imagination by care, frankness by isolation, joy by fear before tomorrow's day, pleasure from life by tiredness from it. The weariness from life occurs when the person makes violence above himself, breaking his individuality, and the nature does not forgive infringement of its laws. As in an external world there are environmental problems, such is violation of natural laws of development of a private world is conducted to weariness, nervous and mental dissonances, other illnesses.

For harmonious development of the personality the child should be and grow in a healthy society - with harmonious, and comfortable mutual relations and a sound mind directed to the person, but not on the contrary, as it is now. Socionics opens natural mutual relations in a society, helps to correct relationship and to create new, psychologically comfortable, opening the laws of interpersonal interactions. Is it not a value?

Sciences about the person theoretically examine three conditions of formation of the person: biogenetics studies his heredity, sociogenetics and social psychology - a microhabitation, a social status and a social heredity, pedagogics a process of education in school and domestic conditions. But at such complex of conditions of formation of the personality problems of the person are not solved. A classical problem of parents and children still exists, as occurrence of misunderstanding, conflicts and contradictions between representatives of different generations. There are obstacles in dialogue between teachers and pupils, it is a lot of conflict situations arises between children. Such disagreements do not conduct to harmonious development, but rather to estrangement and imperception of public requirements. So, the requirementin to solve these problems ripes in a society, proceeding from laws of human mentality, because needs, desires, emotions and ideas cause acts and are motives of behaviour. Socionics gives knowledge of inherent mental genetic code of the person, and use of its laws in pedagogics in a complex will help to direct development of the child, taking into account hereditary, typical (socionic) features and social conditions.

 Socionics for psychology

The psychology can be considered as continuation of philosophy, and socionics - as practical applied science which develops and improves psychology.

The psychology studies processes of display by the person of an objective reality. It gets knowledge about mentality of the person, based on results of observation of behaviour of the person and on results of various tests which enable to draw approximate conclusions concerning isolated characteristics of display of human mentality. As psychology opens the integral particles of the phenomena and does not deny their existence as mental qualities in the person, observes and their changes during the certain age period, it is better to analyze these changes in mentality on the basis of synthesis of mental qualities which would allow to predict mental reactions, but from a position of knowledge of complete mental structure of the person.

For the decision of this vital task the psychology, as well as any science, may use achivements of other sciences for its improvement, and in this case of socionics, which has used not only knowledge of psychology but also synthesized in itself particles of other sciences, namely: medicine, sociology, graphology, computer science, physiognomy, demography.

The subject of psychology as well as socionics is mentality of the person and its supreme form - consciousness. The main difference of these sciences is in a subject of studying and methods of processing of a material. If a subject of socionics is a socionic personality type, a subject of psychology is a phenotype. If socionics finds the real individual differences, the psychology investigates approximation or a deviation from certain norms, which are established on unknown basis.

The psychology proclaims, that display of the reality by the person occures with the help of a brain, and mentality is the product of a brain, which created only by external conditions. But the mentality is not a product of a brain, is a soul of the person which synthesizes perception of the validity displayed by a brain (externally) and perception of display of inborn qualities of mentality (internally).

Psychologists feel imperfection of methods which are in their arsenal, and have a precept if you can not help it is better to do no harm as deal with a thin matter of human mentality of a person the most complex system in the world which is not clear to them. You see the person is the most complicated system and it is necessary to study it in a complex, integrating knowledge of many sciences which study a person. Any psychological consultation will be carried out qualitatively only in that case if the psychologist will know the socionic personality type of a person, people of which personality types this person works with, supports amicable and intimate communications, - only then it is possible to carry out constructive analytical conversation, without regrets, and with the decision of problems.

As psychologists do not own knowledge of socionics, they advise to correct own behaviour through knowledge of social norms and strong-willed efforts of self-checking. But it does not help, rather on the contrary, people feel violence on own person. And in stressful situations self-checking is completely lost, the person lose control above itself and operates spontaneously. Such spontaneous unguided actions meaningly depend on displays of socionic personality type. Knowing reactions of own mentality which display according to personality type, it is possible to foresee the actions in these or those situations and to know, how others will act, knowing their personality types. If to realize itself behind strong qualities, necessity for self-control disappears, the person operates naturally, free in the own displays, sure and satisfied with itself and life. Such people are positively perceived by others.

Psychology discovers mutual relations between separate members in groups, such as business and interpersonal. Much value is given to a self-estimation of the person in a group, his demands and insistence. It is considered, that conflicts arise in case if a level of insistence of a member of a group is too high and does not coincide with positions of a group. Socionics confirm that between people in groups there are 4 kinds of relations: formal, business, amicable, family. The conflict arises not from demands or insistence of the person, but from the natural law of compatibility of relationships. Conflict not always may occure in any natural relationships. The essence of them is, that the person must knew, what mental qualities has addition and approachement with others and which is not, and knew thus, at what relations it is necessary to keep a certain distance in order to perceive and hear each other correctly. Infringement of this distance is the beginning of gradual development of the conflict. Full addition and association of people exists only in relations of duality, where there is no need to adjust distance which is determined naturally and does not influence negatively on interaction. Whether thus the person can confidently prove or convince his sights.

Swiss psychologist of ղ-th century Charles Gustav Jung wrote: I has understood, that from chaos of modern psychology it is impossible to extract precise criteria - they just should be created, and not from air, but on the basis of invaluable works of predecessors. So, development of psychology has naturally resulted in opening harmonous laws of socionics, which are able to open practically exactly the mental qualities of each person incorporated in him by nature and even to predict his relationships with others. Individual experience at public interactions gives stratification of separate character traits, but perception and estimation internal and an external world, given from birth is constant. Certainly, a persons changes during life - his habits change, the behaviour, interests, in a word, character becomes another. But only character changes, not the socionic personality type. Education may give type of some pecularities, weaken or strengthen certain features. It is possible to give opportunity to reveal type or to depress it, but it is impossible to change personality type.

Psychologists, using tests, show the persons character which changes during life, according to conditions of private life and a social status of a society.

Socionic specialists, who use tests at definition of personality type can be compared with doctors who instead of diagnosing the patient, offer him to define the illness on semiology. So, the unique true are techniques of physiognomy which precisely show inborn character, i.e. socionic personality type which is constant. Psychologists search the bridge between mental and biological, techniques of physiognomy show and use this bridge.

To analyse features of mental processes and to give the psychological help it is necessary to determine a basis of a structure of mentality and ways of its interaction with an environment, i.e. individual methods of perception and processing of the information through definition of socionic personality type. The knowledge of personality type enables to know laws of a course of mental processes and to foresee probable reaction in different situations, to define temperament correctly and tendencies to a level of a self-estimation etc. Knowing these bases, it is possible to work on definition and correction of other mental qualities: degrees of development of imagination, memory, figurative thinking, perception, will, - all those qualities which psychology investigates . Socionics shows law of features functioning of mental qualities of any personality type, whereas the psychology shows a level of development of separate quality (without interference and interrelation). Socionics opens the reasons and predicts consequences, the psychology shows result - a condition of mentality on this or that moment, not opening dynamics of development through connection of cause and effect.

So, socionics gives base to psychology, directs and unites isolated knowledge, coordinating them and giving the complete information about a person.

 We offer

Scientists who aspire the truth, address to socionics, then you will give a practicality in those areas of a science which you develop. 



 ]  ]  ]  ]  ]  ]  ] [ ] [ ]  ] ]


2001 ViVo Studio
2001-2004 . .